Avatar
omochimetaru 11/8/2018 2:21 AM
It's not quite that cut and dry. As soon as you have more than one thing with this sugar, you get composition issues—is () throws async -> () a Result> or a Future>? More likely what you want when you're inside the context is to have a set of "effects" rather than a nesting...
2:22 AM
JoeGroff書き込んでここでも「エフェクトが欲しいんじゃないの?」って書いてる?
2:23 AM
Like much of the proposed API here, though, it's probably best to consider that additively once we get the basic type in place.
ここが読解できないんですけど、Resultを入れるんじゃなくてAPIごとにenumでも定義したら?って意味です?
(edited)